On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:15:03PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 03:40:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > The patch below does not apply to the 5.4-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > From 519ea6f1c82fcdc9842908155ae379de47818778 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2021 13:40:56 +0000 > > Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix kernel address detection of __is_lm_address() > > > > Currently, the __is_lm_address() check just masks out the top 12 bits > > of the address, but if they are 0, it still yields a true result. > > This has as a side effect that virt_addr_valid() returns true even for > > invalid virtual addresses (e.g. 0x0). > > > > Fix the detection checking that it's actually a kernel address starting > > at PAGE_OFFSET. > > > > Fixes: 68dd8ef32162 ("arm64: memory: Fix virt_addr_valid() using __is_lm_address()") > > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 5.4.x > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Suggested-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@xxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210126134056.45747-1-vincenzo.frascino@xxxxxxx > > Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx> > > I sent you the 5.4 and 5.10 backports of this patch. There is another > fix in this area which I'll send to Linus tonight. It should apply > cleanly on 5.4 and 5.10. Both now applied. What is the git id of the other fix in Linus's tree? thanks, greg k-h