Re: [PATCH] tpm: WARN_ONCE() -> pr_warn_once() in tpm_tis_status()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/2/21 10:33 AM, jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>

An unexpected status from TPM chip is not irrecovable failure of the
kernel. It's only undesirable situation. Thus, change the WARN_ONCE
instance inside tpm_tis_status() to pr_warn_once().

In addition: print the status in the log message because it is actually
useful information lacking from the existing log message.

Suggested-by:  Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 6f4f57f0b909 ("tpm: ibmvtpm: fix error return code in tpm_ibmvtpm_probe()")
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 431919d5f48a..21f67c6366cb 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static u8 tpm_tis_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
  		 * acquired.  Usually because tpm_try_get_ops() hasn't
  		 * been called before doing a TPM operation.
  		 */
-		WARN_ONCE(1, "TPM returned invalid status\n");
+		pr_warn_once("TPM returned invalid status: 0x%x\n", status);
  		return 0;
  	}

Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux