On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:58:53PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 16:46, Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:43:51PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jan 2021 at 15:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.93 release. > > > > There are 88 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Thu, 28 Jan 2021 09:42:44 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.93-rc2.gz > > > > or in the git tree and branch at: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y > > > > and the diffstat can be found below. > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > > > As Daniel pointed in the other email thread, > > > riscv failed build: > > > * clang-10-defconfig - FAILED > > > * clang-11-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-8-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-9-defconfig - FAILED > > > * gcc-10-defconfig - FAILED > > > > > > the riscv build failed due to the below commit. > > > > > > > Sagar Shrikant Kadam <sagar.kadam@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > dts: phy: add GPIO number and active state used for phy reset > > > > > > make --silent --keep-going --jobs=8 > > > O=/home/tuxbuild/.cache/tuxmake/builds/1/tmp ARCH=riscv > > > CROSS_COMPILE=riscv64-linux-gnu- 'CC=sccache riscv64-linux-gnu-gcc' > > > 'HOSTCC=sccache gcc' > > > arch/riscv/boot/dts/sifive/hifive-unleashed-a00.dts:88.27-28 syntax error > > > FATAL ERROR: Unable to parse input tree > > > > > > Build log, > > > https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc/-/jobs/986616680 > > > > Crap, forgot that one. Will go drop it now and push out a -rc3. Is > > this an issue for 5.10.y? > > No. > 5.10 builds are successful. Wonderful, thanks for letting me know. This round of kernels were a pain for some reason... greg k-h
