From: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit a0a6df9afcaf439a6b4c88a3b522e3d05fdef46f upstream.
Unfortunately, there's userland code that used to rely upon these
checks being done before anything else to check for UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW
support. That broke in 41525f56e256 ("fs: refactor ksys_umount").
Separate those from the rest of checks and move them to ksys_umount();
unlike everything else in there, this can be sanely done there.
Reported-by: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 41525f56e256 ("fs: refactor ksys_umount")
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/namespace.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/namespace.c
+++ b/fs/namespace.c
@@ -1713,8 +1713,6 @@ static int can_umount(const struct path
{
struct mount *mnt = real_mount(path->mnt);
- if (flags & ~(MNT_FORCE | MNT_DETACH | MNT_EXPIRE | UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW))
- return -EINVAL;
if (!may_mount())
return -EPERM;
if (path->dentry != path->mnt->mnt_root)
@@ -1728,6 +1726,7 @@ static int can_umount(const struct path
return 0;
}
+// caller is responsible for flags being sane
int path_umount(struct path *path, int flags)
{
struct mount *mnt = real_mount(path->mnt);
@@ -1749,6 +1748,10 @@ static int ksys_umount(char __user *name
struct path path;
int ret;
+ // basic validity checks done first
+ if (flags & ~(MNT_FORCE | MNT_DETACH | MNT_EXPIRE | UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (!(flags & UMOUNT_NOFOLLOW))
lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_FOLLOW;
ret = user_path_at(AT_FDCWD, name, lookup_flags, &path);
