From: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 0aa171e9b267ce7c52d3a3df7bc9c1fc0203dec5 upstream. Pavel reports that commit 17858b140bf4 ("crypto: ecdh - avoid unaligned accesses in ecdh_set_secret()") fixes one problem but introduces another: the unconditional memcpy() introduced by that commit may overflow the target buffer if the source data is invalid, which could be the result of intentional tampering. So check params.key_size explicitly against the size of the target buffer before validating the key further. Fixes: 17858b140bf4 ("crypto: ecdh - avoid unaligned accesses in ecdh_set_secret()") Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- crypto/ecdh.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/crypto/ecdh.c +++ b/crypto/ecdh.c @@ -43,7 +43,8 @@ static int ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto struct ecdh params; unsigned int ndigits; - if (crypto_ecdh_decode_key(buf, len, ¶ms) < 0) + if (crypto_ecdh_decode_key(buf, len, ¶ms) < 0 || + params.key_size > sizeof(ctx->private_key)) return -EINVAL; ndigits = ecdh_supported_curve(params.curve_id);