From: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 1ce65396e6b2386b4fd54f87beff0647a772e1cd ]
The second parameter of do_div is an u32 and NSEC_PER_SEC * prescale
overflows this for bigger periods. Assuming the usual pwm input clk rate
of 66 MHz this happens starting at requested period > 606060 ns.
Splitting the division into two operations doesn't loose any precision.
It doesn't need to be feared that c / NSEC_PER_SEC doesn't fit into the
unsigned long variable "duty_cycles" because in this case the assignment
above to period_cycles would already have been overflowing as
period >= duty_cycle and then the calculation is moot anyhow.
Fixes: aef1a3799b5c ("pwm: imx27: Fix rounding behavior")
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Johannes Pointner <johannes.pointner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
index c50d453552bd4..86bcafd23e4f6 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx27.c
@@ -235,8 +235,9 @@ static int pwm_imx27_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
period_cycles /= prescale;
c = clkrate * state->duty_cycle;
- do_div(c, NSEC_PER_SEC * prescale);
+ do_div(c, NSEC_PER_SEC);
duty_cycles = c;
+ duty_cycles /= prescale;
/*
* according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be PERIOD
--
2.27.0
