From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
commit 138a6428ba9023ae29e103e87a223575fbc3d2b7 upstream.
The reliance on the remoteproc's state for determining when to send
sysmon notifications to a remote processor is racy with regard to
concurrent remoteproc operations.
Further more the advertisement of the state of other remote processor to
a newly started remote processor might not only send the wrong state,
but might result in a stream of state changes that are out of order.
Address this by introducing state tracking within the sysmon instances
themselves and extend the locking to ensure that the notifications are
consistent with this state.
Fixes: 1f36ab3f6e3b ("remoteproc: sysmon: Inform current rproc about all active rprocs")
Fixes: 1877f54f75ad ("remoteproc: sysmon: Add notifications for events")
Fixes: 1fb82ee806d1 ("remoteproc: qcom: Introduce sysmon")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Rishabh Bhatnagar <rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201122054135.802935-2-bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/remoteproc/qcom_sysmon.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_sysmon.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_sysmon.c
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@ struct qcom_sysmon {
struct rproc_subdev subdev;
struct rproc *rproc;
+ int state;
+ struct mutex state_lock;
+
struct list_head node;
const char *name;
@@ -448,7 +451,10 @@ static int sysmon_prepare(struct rproc_s
.ssr_event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_POWERUP
};
+ mutex_lock(&sysmon->state_lock);
+ sysmon->state = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_POWERUP;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&sysmon_notifiers, 0, (void *)&event);
+ mutex_unlock(&sysmon->state_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -472,20 +478,25 @@ static int sysmon_start(struct rproc_sub
.ssr_event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_POWERUP
};
+ mutex_lock(&sysmon->state_lock);
+ sysmon->state = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_POWERUP;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&sysmon_notifiers, 0, (void *)&event);
+ mutex_unlock(&sysmon->state_lock);
mutex_lock(&sysmon_lock);
list_for_each_entry(target, &sysmon_list, node) {
- if (target == sysmon ||
- target->rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING)
+ if (target == sysmon)
continue;
+ mutex_lock(&target->state_lock);
event.subsys_name = target->name;
+ event.ssr_event = target->state;
if (sysmon->ssctl_version == 2)
ssctl_send_event(sysmon, &event);
else if (sysmon->ept)
sysmon_send_event(sysmon, &event);
+ mutex_unlock(&target->state_lock);
}
mutex_unlock(&sysmon_lock);
@@ -500,7 +511,10 @@ static void sysmon_stop(struct rproc_sub
.ssr_event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN
};
+ mutex_lock(&sysmon->state_lock);
+ sysmon->state = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_BEFORE_SHUTDOWN;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&sysmon_notifiers, 0, (void *)&event);
+ mutex_unlock(&sysmon->state_lock);
/* Don't request graceful shutdown if we've crashed */
if (crashed)
@@ -521,7 +535,10 @@ static void sysmon_unprepare(struct rpro
.ssr_event = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_SHUTDOWN
};
+ mutex_lock(&sysmon->state_lock);
+ sysmon->state = SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_SHUTDOWN;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&sysmon_notifiers, 0, (void *)&event);
+ mutex_unlock(&sysmon->state_lock);
}
/**
@@ -534,11 +551,10 @@ static int sysmon_notify(struct notifier
void *data)
{
struct qcom_sysmon *sysmon = container_of(nb, struct qcom_sysmon, nb);
- struct rproc *rproc = sysmon->rproc;
struct sysmon_event *sysmon_event = data;
/* Skip non-running rprocs and the originating instance */
- if (rproc->state != RPROC_RUNNING ||
+ if (sysmon->state != SSCTL_SSR_EVENT_AFTER_POWERUP ||
!strcmp(sysmon_event->subsys_name, sysmon->name)) {
dev_dbg(sysmon->dev, "not notifying %s\n", sysmon->name);
return NOTIFY_DONE;
@@ -591,6 +607,7 @@ struct qcom_sysmon *qcom_add_sysmon_subd
init_completion(&sysmon->ind_comp);
init_completion(&sysmon->shutdown_comp);
mutex_init(&sysmon->lock);
+ mutex_init(&sysmon->state_lock);
sysmon->shutdown_irq = of_irq_get_byname(sysmon->dev->of_node,
"shutdown-ack");
