On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:16:34AM +0800, Chao Yu wrote: > As kitestramuort reported: > > F2FS-fs (nvme0n1p4): access invalid blkaddr:1598541474 > [ 25.725898] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 25.725903] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 2018 at f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x23a/0x250 > [ 25.725923] Call Trace: > [ 25.725927] ? f2fs_llseek+0x204/0x620 > [ 25.725929] ? ovl_copy_up_data+0x14f/0x200 > [ 25.725931] ? ovl_copy_up_inode+0x174/0x1e0 > [ 25.725933] ? ovl_copy_up_one+0xa22/0xdf0 > [ 25.725936] ? ovl_copy_up_flags+0xa6/0xf0 > [ 25.725938] ? ovl_aio_cleanup_handler+0xd0/0xd0 > [ 25.725939] ? ovl_maybe_copy_up+0x86/0xa0 > [ 25.725941] ? ovl_open+0x22/0x80 > [ 25.725943] ? do_dentry_open+0x136/0x350 > [ 25.725945] ? path_openat+0xb7e/0xf40 > [ 25.725947] ? __check_sticky+0x40/0x40 > [ 25.725948] ? do_filp_open+0x70/0x100 > [ 25.725950] ? __check_sticky+0x40/0x40 > [ 25.725951] ? __check_sticky+0x40/0x40 > [ 25.725953] ? __x64_sys_openat+0x1db/0x2c0 > [ 25.725955] ? do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x40 > [ 25.725957] ? entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 > > llseek() reports invalid block address access, the root cause is if > file has inline data, f2fs_seek_block() will access inline data regard > as block address index in inode block, which should be wrong, fix it. > > Fixes: 788e96d1d3994 ("f2fs: code cleanup by removing unnecessary check") > Fixes: 267378d4de69 ("f2fs: introduce f2fs_seek_block to support SEEK_{DATA, HOLE} in llseek") > Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 3.16+ > Reported-by: kitestramuort <kitestramuort@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > This will cause boot failure in f2fs image, which was reported in gentoo > community, I'd like to fix them in stable kernel 5.10 first as request in > bugzilla: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210825 <formletter> This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html for how to do this properly. </formletter>