3.11.10.9 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 483e2dfdbc94751430e41db9973985f5b054d322 upstream.
Fixes: 4aab3fadad32 ("mfd: tps65910: Move interrupt implementation code to mfd file")
tps65910_irq_init() sets 'tps65910->chip_irq' before calling
regmap_add_irq_chip(). If the regmap_add_irq_chip() call fails in
memory allocation of regmap_irq_chip_data members then:
1. The 'tps65910->chip_irq' will still hold some value
2. 'tps65910->irq_data' will be pointing to already freed memory
(because regmap_add_irq_chip() will free it on error)
This results in invalid memory access during driver remove because the
tps65910_irq_exit() tests whether 'tps65910->chip_irq' is not zero.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index d792772..de87eaf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -254,8 +254,10 @@ static int tps65910_irq_init(struct tps65910 *tps65910, int irq,
ret = regmap_add_irq_chip(tps65910->regmap, tps65910->chip_irq,
IRQF_ONESHOT, pdata->irq_base,
tps6591x_irqs_chip, &tps65910->irq_data);
- if (ret < 0)
+ if (ret < 0) {
dev_warn(tps65910->dev, "Failed to add irq_chip %d\n", ret);
+ tps65910->chip_irq = 0;
+ }
return ret;
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html