czw., 10 gru 2020 o 18:56 Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a): > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 06:43:50PM +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote: > > I must admit that due to other duties I did not follow the mainline > > mvpp2 for a couple revisions (and I am not maintainer of it). However > > recently I got reached-out directly by different developers - the > > trigger was different distros upgrading the kernel above v5.4+ and for > > some reasons the DT path is not chosen there (and the ACPI will be > > chosen more and more in the SystemReady world). > > Please note that there is no active maintainer for mvpp2. > Right. I think I can volunteer to be one (my name is in the driver code anyway :) ) and spend some time on reviewing/testing the patches, unless there are no objections. In such case, are the drivers/net Mainteners who decide/accept it? > It will be good to get rid of the ACPI hack here, as that means we'll > be using the same code paths for both ACPI and DT, meaning hopefully > less bugs like this go unnoticed. > +1. As soon as the MDIO+ACPI lands, I plan to do the rework. Best regards, Marcin
