Re: [PATCH for v4.4] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH for v4.4] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 13:52:09 +0100
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <hca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20201123171549.20544-1-gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 06:15:49PM +0100, Gerald Schaefer wrote:
> commit bfe8cc1db02ab243c62780f17fc57f65bde0afe1 upstream.

Now applied, sorry for the delay.

greg k-h

References:
- FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
  - From: gregkh
- [PATCH for v4.4] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
  - From: Gerald Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] btrfs: cleanup cow block on error" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Next by Date: Re: request for 5.9/5.4-stable: 4f134b89a24b ("lib/syscall: fix syscall registers retrieval on 32-bit platforms")
Previous by thread: [PATCH for v4.4] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling handle_userfault()
Next by thread: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/userfaultfd: do not access vma->vm_mm after calling" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux