Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mm: memblock: enforce overlap of memory.memblock and memory.reserved

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:43:03PM +0200, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> memblock does not require that the reserved memory ranges will be a subset
> of memblock.memory.
> 
> As the result there maybe reserved pages that are not in the range of any
> zone or node because zone and node boundaries are detected based on
> memblock.memory and pages that only present in memblock.reserved are not
> taken into account during zone/node size detection.
> 
> Make sure that all ranges in memblock.reserved are added to memblock.memory
> before calculating node and zone boundaries.
> 
> Fixes: 73a6e474cb37 ("mm: memmap_init: iterate over memblock regions rather that check each PFN")
> Reported-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/memblock.h |  1 +
>  mm/memblock.c            | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  mm/page_alloc.c          |  7 +++++++
>  3 files changed, 32 insertions(+)


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux