membarrier()'s MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE is documented
as syncing the core on all sibling threads but not necessarily the
calling thread. This behavior is fundamentally buggy and cannot be used
safely. Suppose a user program has two threads. Thread A is on CPU 0
and thread B is on CPU 1. Thread A modifies some text and calls
membarrier(MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_SYNC_CORE). Then thread B
executes the modified code. If, at any point after membarrier() decides
which CPUs to target, thread A could be preempted and replaced by thread
B on CPU 0. This could even happen on exit from the membarrier()
syscall. If this happens, thread B will end up running on CPU 0 without
having synced.
In principle, this could be fixed by arranging for the scheduler to
sync_core_before_usermode() whenever switching between two threads in
the same mm if there is any possibility of a concurrent membarrier()
call, but this would have considerable overhead. Instead, make
membarrier() sync the calling CPU as well.
As an optimization, this avoids an extra smp_mb() in the default
barrier-only mode.
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
index 01538b31f27e..57266ab32ef9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
@@ -333,7 +333,8 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id)
return -EPERM;
}
- if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 || num_online_cpus() == 1)
+ if (flags != MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE &&
+ (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 || num_online_cpus() == 1))
return 0;
/*
@@ -352,8 +353,6 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id)
if (cpu_id >= nr_cpu_ids || !cpu_online(cpu_id))
goto out;
- if (cpu_id == raw_smp_processor_id())
- goto out;
rcu_read_lock();
p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu_id)->curr);
if (!p || p->mm != mm) {
@@ -368,16 +367,6 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id)
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct task_struct *p;
- /*
- * Skipping the current CPU is OK even through we can be
- * migrated at any point. The current CPU, at the point
- * where we read raw_smp_processor_id(), is ensured to
- * be in program order with respect to the caller
- * thread. Therefore, we can skip this CPU from the
- * iteration.
- */
- if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
- continue;
p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
if (p && p->mm == mm)
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask);
@@ -385,12 +374,38 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags, int cpu_id)
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- preempt_disable();
- if (cpu_id >= 0)
+ if (cpu_id >= 0) {
+ /*
+ * smp_call_function_single() will call ipi_func() if cpu_id
+ * is the calling CPU.
+ */
smp_call_function_single(cpu_id, ipi_func, NULL, 1);
- else
- smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, 1);
- preempt_enable();
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * For regular membarrier, we can save a few cycles by
+ * skipping the current cpu -- we're about to do smp_mb()
+ * below, and if we migrate to a different cpu, this cpu
+ * and the new cpu will execute a full barrier in the
+ * scheduler.
+ *
+ * For CORE_SYNC, we do need a barrier on the current cpu --
+ * otherwise, if we are migrated and replaced by a different
+ * task in the same mm just before, during, or after
+ * membarrier, we will end up with some thread in the mm
+ * running without a core sync.
+ *
+ * For RSEQ, don't rseq_preempt() the caller. User code
+ * is not supposed to issue syscalls at all from inside an
+ * rseq critical section.
+ */
+ if (flags != MEMBARRIER_FLAG_SYNC_CORE) {
+ preempt_disable();
+ smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, true);
+ preempt_enable();
+ } else {
+ on_each_cpu_mask(tmpmask, ipi_func, NULL, true);
+ }
+ }
out:
if (cpu_id < 0)
--
2.28.0
