Am 2020-12-03 15:40, schrieb Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
On 12/3/20 1:00 AM, Michael Walle wrote:--- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sst.c @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ static const struct flash_info sst_parts[] = { SECT_4K | SST_WRITE) }, { "sst25vf032b", INFO(0xbf254a, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, SECT_4K | SST_WRITE) }, - { "sst25vf064c", INFO(0xbf254b, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, SECT_4K) }, + { "sst25vf064c", INFO(0xbf254b, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, + SECT_4K | SPI_NOR_4BIT_BP) },And I would put 1/7 after 4/7, so that I can set the locking flags in some order: SPI_NOR_HAS_LOCK | SPI_NOR_4BIT_BP. We first indicate that the flash supports locking, and then what kind of locking, BP3, and not the other way around.
If that patch shouldn't make it into stable, then yes. otherwise, I've put these patches first to not cause merge conflicts. -michael
