On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 10:03:49 +0800 Miles Chen <miles.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, 2020-11-27 at 19:52 -0800, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > The patch titled > > Subject: proc: use untagged_addr() for pagemap_read addresses > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is > > proc-use-untagged_addr-for-pagemap_read-addresses.patch > > > > This patch should soon appear at > > https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/proc-use-untagged_addr-for-pagemap_read-addresses.patch > > and later at > > https://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/proc-use-untagged_addr-for-pagemap_read-addresses.patch > > > > Before you just go and hit "reply", please: > > a) Consider who else should be cc'ed > > b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well > > c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a > > reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's > > > > *** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code *** > > > > The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated > > there every 3-4 working days > > Sorry for bothering, I checked the next-20201201 tag and the patch in > next-20201201 is [1], but there is a overflow issue in [1] so I > submitted v2 [2]. We should take [2], right? > (the patch in this email is [2] but the patch in next-20201201 is [1]) > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1343258/ > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1345874/ > Yup, I haven't released an -mm snapshot since updating to v2. (Been waiting for an arm64 situation to settle itself out). Hopefully today...
