On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:44:28AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 09:21:19AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
On Wed, 2 Dec 2020 at 08:49, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 12:03:18PM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:
> > Hey Sasha, sorry to annoy again, but maybe Peter is very busy - wouldn't
> > be possible maybe to get that merged after a review from Ben or Ingo? I
> > see them in the MAINTAINERS file, specially Ben as CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> > maintainer.
> >
> > I understand the confidence in this patch is relatively high, since it's
> > a backport from the author, right?
>
> I still want to see an ack from the maintainer please.
SCHEDULER
M: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx> (SCHED_NORMAL)
Vincent is also the one that knows that leaf code best, he did the
backport, you're not going to get better than that.
So I've asked for someone else to review this because the backport is
somehat different from the upstream commit. Ideally we want these types
of backports to be peer reviewed, just like any other commit that lands
upstream.
If the sched folks feel good about that backport (as indicated above...)
I'll happily merge it in.
--
Thanks,
Sasha
