On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 11:03:36AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 01/12/20 10:57, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > Since you did not apply "KVM: x86: handle !lapic_in_kernel case in > > > kvm_cpu_*_extint" to 4.19 or earlier, please leave this one out as well. > > Isn't it patch 07 of this series? > > Yes, it arrived a few minutes after I hit send for whatever reason. Though > it still applies to 4.14 and earlier: > > ` [PATCH 4.14 04/50] wireless: Use linux/stddef.h instead of stddef.h > ` [PATCH 4.14 07/50] btrfs: adjust return values of btrfs_inode_by_name > ` [PATCH 4.14 08/50] btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer > dereference > ` [PATCH 4.14 09/50] KVM: x86: Fix split-irqchip vs interrupt injection > window request > > ` [PATCH 4.9 05/42] btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance chunk checker to validate > chunk profile > ` [PATCH 4.9 06/42] btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer > dereference > ` [PATCH 4.9 07/42] KVM: x86: Fix split-irqchip vs interrupt injection > window request > > ` [PATCH 4.4 01/24] btrfs: tree-checker: Enhance chunk checker to validate > chunk profile > ` [PATCH 4.4 02/24] btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer > dereference > ` [PATCH 4.4 03/24] KVM: x86: Fix split-irqchip vs interrupt injection > window request Ok, I will go drop this patch from 4.14, 4.9, and 4.4. Or, should the needed pre-requisite patch be properly backported there instead? And was it marked somewhere that this patch depended on that one and I just missed it? thanks, greg k-h
