From: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
commit 6d06b0ad94d3dd7e3503d8ad39c39c4634884611 upstream.
There are sectorsize alignment checks that are reported but then
check_extent_data_ref continues. This was not intended, wrong alignment
is not a minor problem and we should return with error.
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.4+
Fixes: 0785a9aacf9d ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add EXTENT_DATA_REF check")
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -1269,6 +1269,7 @@ static int check_extent_data_ref(struct
"invalid item size, have %u expect aligned to %zu for key type %u",
btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
sizeof(*dref), key->type);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
}
if (!IS_ALIGNED(key->objectid, leaf->fs_info->sectorsize)) {
generic_err(leaf, slot,
@@ -1297,6 +1298,7 @@ static int check_extent_data_ref(struct
extent_err(leaf, slot,
"invalid extent data backref offset, have %llu expect aligned to %u",
offset, leaf->fs_info->sectorsize);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
}
}
return 0;
