From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
commit d21b96c8ed2aea7e6b7bf4735e1d2503cfbf4072 upstream.
The code change for switching to non-atomic mode brought the
unexpected mutex deadlock in get_msg(). It converted the spinlock
with the existing mutex, but there were calls with the already holding
the mutex. Since the only place that needs the extra lock is the code
path from snd_mixart_send_msg(), remove the mutex lock in get_msg()
and apply in the caller side for fixing the mutex deadlock.
Fixes: 8d3a8b5cb57d ("ALSA: mixart: Use nonatomic PCM ops")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201119121440.18945-1-tiwai@xxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c
+++ b/sound/pci/mixart/mixart_core.c
@@ -70,7 +70,6 @@ static int get_msg(struct mixart_mgr *mg
unsigned int i;
#endif
- mutex_lock(&mgr->msg_lock);
err = 0;
/* copy message descriptor from miXart to driver */
@@ -119,8 +118,6 @@ static int get_msg(struct mixart_mgr *mg
writel_be(headptr, MIXART_MEM(mgr, MSG_OUTBOUND_FREE_HEAD));
_clean_exit:
- mutex_unlock(&mgr->msg_lock);
-
return err;
}
@@ -258,7 +255,9 @@ int snd_mixart_send_msg(struct mixart_mg
resp.data = resp_data;
resp.size = max_resp_size;
+ mutex_lock(&mgr->msg_lock);
err = get_msg(mgr, &resp, msg_frame);
+ mutex_unlock(&mgr->msg_lock);
if( request->message_id != resp.message_id )
dev_err(&mgr->pci->dev, "RESPONSE ERROR!\n");
