Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:57:09 -0500
Cc: peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@xxxxxxxxxx>, bsegall@xxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, pauld@xxxxxxxxxx, zohooouoto@xxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nivedita.singhvi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, halves@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <d3188913-ddb8-7198-8483-47d3031b01fe@canonical.com>

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:56:01AM -0300, Guilherme G. Piccoli wrote:

Hi Sasha / Peter, is there anything blocking this backport from Vincent
to get merged in 5.4.y?


An ack from Peter...

--
Thanks,
Sasha

Follow-Ups:
- Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
  - From: Nivedita Singhvi

References:
- Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
  - From: Guilherme G. Piccoli

Prev by Date: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] thermal: tegra: Avoid setting edp_irq when not relevant
Previous by thread: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Next by thread: Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list" failed to apply to 5.4-stable tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux