From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
commit f96d6960abbc52e26ad124e69e6815283d3e1674 upstream.
The error message for inode transid is the same as for inode generation,
which makes us unable to detect the real problem.
Reported-by: Tyler Richmond <t.d.richmond@xxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 496245cac57e ("btrfs: tree-checker: Verify inode item")
CC: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 4.19: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -715,7 +715,7 @@ static int check_inode_item(struct btrfs
/* Note for ROOT_TREE_DIR_ITEM, mkfs could set its transid 0 */
if (btrfs_inode_transid(leaf, iitem) > super_gen + 1) {
inode_item_err(fs_info, leaf, slot,
- "invalid inode generation: has %llu expect [0, %llu]",
+ "invalid inode transid: has %llu expect [0, %llu]",
btrfs_inode_transid(leaf, iitem), super_gen + 1);
return -EUCLEAN;
}
