From: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 22b726cbdd09d9891ede8aa122a950d2d0ae5e09 ]
I'm not a standards expert, but this really looks to be undefined
behavior, when chip->dig_cck may be NULL. (And, we're trying to do a
NULL check a few lines down, because some chip variants will use NULL.)
Fixes: fc637a860a82 ("rtw88: 8723d: Set IG register for CCK rate")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821211716.1631556-1-briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
index 8d93f31597469..9687b376d221b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c
@@ -147,12 +147,13 @@ void rtw_phy_dig_write(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, u8 igi)
{
struct rtw_chip_info *chip = rtwdev->chip;
struct rtw_hal *hal = &rtwdev->hal;
- const struct rtw_hw_reg *dig_cck = &chip->dig_cck[0];
u32 addr, mask;
u8 path;
- if (dig_cck)
+ if (chip->dig_cck) {
+ const struct rtw_hw_reg *dig_cck = &chip->dig_cck[0];
rtw_write32_mask(rtwdev, dig_cck->addr, dig_cck->mask, igi >> 1);
+ }
for (path = 0; path < hal->rf_path_num; path++) {
addr = chip->dig[path].addr;
--
2.25.1
