does 548b8b5168c9 qualify for stable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Please consider whether

commit 548b8b5168c90c42e88f70fcf041b4ce0b8e7aa8
Author: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Thu Sep 17 08:56:11 2020 +0200

    scripts/setlocalversion: make git describe output more reliable

qualifies for -stable. It removes one potential source of binary
non-reproducibility that we have actually seen cause problems.

I'm fine with it not qualifying, but please let me know if so, because
then I'll go and add some workarounds to various customer projects.

In case it doesn't cherry-pick cleanly (I think there might have been
some shell-portability patches replacing $() by `` or something like
that) I am happy to provide backports to the still maintained -stable
branches.

Thanks,
Rasmus



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux