Hi, Greg, On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 10:52, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > But that's not what that commit says should happen, it says it fixes a > commit that showed up in the 5.5 release. > > Is it incorrect? Have you tested this on 5.4.y? Well, this took quite a lot of digging, sorry for the delay (I'm definitely not a timers/vDSO expert, I was just trying to understand the reason for a strange Musl workaround [1]), but you're completely right. Only 5.5+ is affected, since it was at that time the clock_gettime64 entry point was introduced for ARM [2]. Sorry for the noise! Thanks, Rui [1] https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/commit/?id=4486c579cbf0d989080705f515d08cb48636ba88 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/arch/arm/vdso?id=74d06efb9c2f99b496eb118b1e941dc4c6404e93
