Re: block/diskstats: more accurate approximation of io_ticks for slow disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: block/diskstats: more accurate approximation of io_ticks for slow disks
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 15:03:24 +0200
Cc: "'stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Konstantin Khlebnikov'" <khlebnikov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5556dc903145475bbe9fc5fa7d116a05@ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com>

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:06:09PM +0000, Banerjee, Debabrata wrote:
> commit: 2b8bd423614c595540eaadcfbc702afe8e155e50
> 
> Please apply to linux-5.4.y. Without this fix, disk utilization reporting is
> unusable, especially on spinning disks.

Ok, now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h

References:
- block/diskstats: more accurate approximation of io_ticks for slow disks
  - From: Banerjee, Debabrata

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: sd: sd_zbc: Fix handling of host-aware ZBC disks
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations
Previous by thread: block/diskstats: more accurate approximation of io_ticks for slow disks
Next by thread: stable-rc/linux-4.14.y baseline: 128 runs, 2 regressions (v4.14.199-167-g7b80cb61f2b2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]

Powered by Linux