Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 13:36 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 12:29:16PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: Hi, > I meant that instead of falling back to "combined-interface" probing we > could assume that all interfaces with three endpoints are "combined" and > simply ignore the union and call managementy. descriptors and all the ways > that devices may have gotten those wrong. I am afraid we would break the spec. I cannot recall a prohibition on having more endpoints than necessary. Heuristics and ignoring invalid descriptors is one things. Ignoring valid descriptors is something else. > I was thinking more of the individual entries in the device-id table > whose control interfaces may not even be of the Communication class. But > hopefully that was verified when adding them. Now you are confusing me. In case of a quirky device, why change the current logic? Regards Oliver
