From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit d95fe371ecd28901f11256c610b988ed44e36ee2 ]
The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index 1806b1da43665..3a2f022f6bde2 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned int cpu;
cpumask_t mask;
@@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
chip->restore = false;
for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
int index;
- struct cpufreq_policy policy;
- cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
- index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
- powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
- cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
+ policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+ if (!policy)
+ continue;
+ index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
+ powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
+ cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
+ cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
}
out:
put_online_cpus();
--
2.25.1
