On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 20:29, Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:31:54PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 05:15:49PM +0000, Codrin.Ciubotariu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> On 07.09.2020 17:24, Kristof Havasi wrote: > >> > Dear Ciubatariu, > >> > > >> > as I am not familiar with the linux development workflow, I am > >> > contacting you directly as the author of the upstream patch: > >> > af199a1a9cb02ec0194804bd46c174b6db262075 > >> > > >> > I noticed that your addition there was applied twice into 5.4 [1] > >> > > >> > d9b8206e5323ae3c9b5b4177478a1224108642f7 v5.4.51-45-gd9b8206e5323 > >> > d55dad8b1d893fae0c4e778abf2ace048bcbad86 v5.4.52-13-gd55dad8b1d89 > >> > > >> > resulting in a non-harmful, but unnecessary double setting of the variable. > >> > > >> > /* set the real number of ports */ > >> > dev->ds->num_ports = dev->port_cnt; > >> > > >> > /* set the real number of ports */ > >> > dev->ds->num_ports = dev->port_cnt; > >> > > >> > return 0; > >> > > >> > Could you notify the stable maintainers to apply your patch correctly? > >> > > >> > Best regards, > >> > Kristóf Havasi > >> > > >> > > >> > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz8795.c?h=v5.4.63#n1274 > >> > > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> Kristóf discovered that one patch of mine was applied twice. What is the > >> best way to address this? > > > >Send us a revert would be best. > > I'll queue up a revert, nothing else is required on your end, thanks for > reporting! > > -- > Thanks, > Sasha Honestly, I am impressed how responsive this community is! Thank you for your responses!
