Re: [PATCH v8 01/17] drm/i915: Fix sha_text population code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi

[This is an automated email]

This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: ee5e5e7a5e0f ("drm/i915: Add HDCP framework + base implementation").

The bot has tested the following trees: v5.8.2, v5.7.16, v5.4.59, v4.19.140.

v5.8.2: Build OK!
v5.7.16: Build OK!
v5.4.59: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    65833c463886 ("drm/i915/hdcp: conversion to struct drm_device based logging macros.")
    667944ad77f1 ("drm/i915/hdcp: use intel_de_*() functions for register access")
    692059318c0f ("drm/i915/hdcp: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+")

v4.19.140: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
    09d7e46b97c6 ("drm/i915: Pull VM lists under the VM mutex.")
    16e4dd0342a8 ("drm/i915: Markup paired operations on wakerefs")
    1d455f8de8e8 ("drm/i915: rename intel_drv.h to display/intel_display_types.h")
    27fec1f9734d ("drm/i915: extract intel_dp.h from intel_drv.h")
    39e2f501c1b4 ("drm/i915: Split struct intel_context definition to its own header")
    480cd6dd9287 ("drm/i915/selftests: Track evict objects explicitly")
    499197dc1696 ("drm/i915: Stop tracking MRU activity on VMA")
    528cbd17ceff ("drm/i915: Move vma lookup to its own lock")
    531747b8200a ("drm/i915/dvo: rename dvo.h to intel_dvo_dev.h and make self-contained")
    64d6c500a384 ("drm/i915: Generalise GPU activity tracking")
    667944ad77f1 ("drm/i915/hdcp: use intel_de_*() functions for register access")
    692059318c0f ("drm/i915/hdcp: Enable HDCP 1.4 and 2.2 on Gen12+")
    71fc448c1aaf ("drm/i915/selftests: Make evict tolerant of foreign objects")
    a037121c3c7f ("drm/i915: Mark up debugfs with rpm wakeref tracking")
    c2400ec3b6d1 ("drm/i915: add Makefile magic for testing headers are self-contained")
    d2ee2e8afeea ("drm/i915: extract intel_crt.h from intel_drv.h")
    d4225a535b3b ("drm/i915: Syntatic sugar for using intel_runtime_pm")


NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.

How should we proceed with this patch?

-- 
Thanks
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux