On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 12:36 PM Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@xxxxxxx> > > [ Upstream commit da2446b66b5e2c7f3ab63912c8d999810e35e8b3 ] > > This reverts commit 9c9b17a7d19a8e21db2e378784fff1128b46c9d3. > Newly released sdma fw (51.52) provides a fix for the issue. > > Signed-off-by: Jiansong Chen <Jiansong.Chen@xxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Kenneth Feng <kenneth.feng@xxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Tao Zhou <tao.zhou1@xxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> Support for this chip does not exist in 5.8 or any other older trees. Please drop this. Alex > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c | 3 --- > 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > index 2c870ff7f8a45..fac77a86c04b2 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v10_0.c > @@ -3427,9 +3427,6 @@ static void gfx_v10_0_check_gfxoff_flag(struct amdgpu_device *adev) > if (!gfx_v10_0_navi10_gfxoff_should_enable(adev)) > adev->pm.pp_feature &= ~PP_GFXOFF_MASK; > break; > - case CHIP_NAVY_FLOUNDER: > - adev->pm.pp_feature &= ~PP_GFXOFF_MASK; > - break; > default: > break; > } > -- > 2.25.1 > > _______________________________________________ > amd-gfx mailing list > amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx
