From: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> [ Upstream commit e679654a704e5bd676ea6446fa7b764cbabf168a ] In our production system, we observed rcu stalls when 'bpftool prog` is running. rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU rcu: \x097-....: (20999 ticks this GP) idle=302/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=1508852/1508852 fqs=4913 \x09(t=21031 jiffies g=2534773 q=179750) NMI backtrace for cpu 7 CPU: 7 PID: 184195 Comm: bpftool Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 5.8.0-00004-g68bfc7f8c1b4 #6 Hardware name: Quanta Twin Lakes MP/Twin Lakes Passive MP, BIOS F09_3A17 05/03/2019 Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack+0x57/0x70 nmi_cpu_backtrace.cold+0x14/0x53 ? lapic_can_unplug_cpu.cold+0x39/0x39 nmi_trigger_cpumask_backtrace+0xb7/0xc7 rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xa2/0xd0 rcu_sched_clock_irq.cold+0x1ff/0x3d9 ? tick_nohz_handler+0x100/0x100 update_process_times+0x5b/0x90 tick_sched_timer+0x5e/0xf0 __hrtimer_run_queues+0x12a/0x2a0 hrtimer_interrupt+0x10e/0x280 __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x51/0xe0 asm_call_on_stack+0xf/0x20 </IRQ> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x6f/0x80 asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 RIP: 0010:task_file_seq_get_next+0x71/0x220 Code: 00 00 8b 53 1c 49 8b 7d 00 89 d6 48 8b 47 20 44 8b 18 41 39 d3 76 75 48 8b 4f 20 8b 01 39 d0 76 61 41 89 d1 49 39 c1 48 19 c0 <48> 8b 49 08 21 d0 48 8d 04 c1 4c 8b 08 4d 85 c9 74 46 49 8b 41 38 RSP: 0018:ffffc90006223e10 EFLAGS: 00000297 RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: ffff888f0d172388 RCX: ffff888c8c07c1c0 RDX: 00000000000f017b RSI: 00000000000f017b RDI: ffff888c254702c0 RBP: ffffc90006223e68 R08: ffff888be2a1c140 R09: 00000000000f017b R10: 0000000000000002 R11: 0000000000100000 R12: ffff888f23c24118 R13: ffffc90006223e60 R14: ffffffff828509a0 R15: 00000000ffffffff task_file_seq_next+0x52/0xa0 bpf_seq_read+0xb9/0x320 vfs_read+0x9d/0x180 ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x60 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 RIP: 0033:0x7f8815f4f76e Code: c0 e9 f6 fe ff ff 55 48 8d 3d 76 70 0a 00 48 89 e5 e8 36 06 02 00 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 14 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 52 c3 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 RSP: 002b:00007fff8f9df578 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000000 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000170b9c0 RCX: 00007f8815f4f76e RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 00007fff8f9df5b0 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: 00007fff8f9e05f0 R08: 0000000000000049 R09: 0000000000000010 R10: 00007f881601fa40 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fff8f9e05a8 R13: 00007fff8f9e05a8 R14: 0000000001917f90 R15: 000000000000e22e Note that `bpftool prog` actually calls a task_file bpf iterator program to establish an association between prog/map/link/btf anon files and processes. In the case where the above rcu stall occured, we had a process having 1587 tasks and each task having roughly 81305 files. This implied 129 million bpf prog invocations. Unfortunwtely none of these files are prog/map/link/btf files so bpf iterator/prog needs to traverse all these files and not able to return to user space since there are no seq_file buffer overflow. This patch fixed the issue in bpf_seq_read() to limit the number of visited objects. If the maximum number of visited objects is reached, no more objects will be visited in the current syscall. If there is nothing written in the seq_file buffer, -EAGAIN will return to the user so user can try again. The maximum number of visited objects is set at 1 million. In our Intel Xeon D-2191 2.3GHZ 18-core server, bpf_seq_read() visiting 1 million files takes around 0.18 seconds. We did not use cond_resched() since for some iterators, e.g., netlink iterator, where rcu read_lock critical section spans between consecutive seq_ops->next(), which makes impossible to do cond_resched() in the key while loop of function bpf_seq_read(). Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@xxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200818222309.2181348-1-yhs@xxxxxx Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 15 ++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c index dd612b80b9fea..3c18090cd73dc 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c @@ -64,6 +64,9 @@ static void bpf_iter_done_stop(struct seq_file *seq) iter_priv->done_stop = true; } +/* maximum visited objects before bailing out */ +#define MAX_ITER_OBJECTS 1000000 + /* bpf_seq_read, a customized and simpler version for bpf iterator. * no_llseek is assumed for this file. * The following are differences from seq_read(): @@ -76,7 +79,7 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size, { struct seq_file *seq = file->private_data; size_t n, offs, copied = 0; - int err = 0; + int err = 0, num_objs = 0; void *p; mutex_lock(&seq->lock); @@ -132,6 +135,7 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size, while (1) { loff_t pos = seq->index; + num_objs++; offs = seq->count; p = seq->op->next(seq, p, &seq->index); if (pos == seq->index) { @@ -150,6 +154,15 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size, if (seq->count >= size) break; + if (num_objs >= MAX_ITER_OBJECTS) { + if (offs == 0) { + err = -EAGAIN; + seq->op->stop(seq, p); + goto done; + } + break; + } + err = seq->op->show(seq, p); if (err > 0) { bpf_iter_dec_seq_num(seq); -- 2.25.1
