From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit a7f8b1c2ac21bf081b41264c9cfd6260dffa6246 ] The incoming qgroup reserved space timing will move the data reservation to ordered extent completely. However in btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() will call btrfs_invalidate_page(), which will clear QGROUP_RESERVED bit for the range. In current stage it's OK, but if we're making ordered extents handle the reserved space, then btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range() can clear the QGROUP_RESERVED bit before we submit ordered extent, leading to qgroup reserved space leakage. So here change the timing to make reserve data space after btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(). The new timing is fine for either current code or the new code. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@xxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/btrfs/file.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file.c b/fs/btrfs/file.c index 1523aa4eaff07..9e8f6c66788d0 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/file.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/file.c @@ -3176,14 +3176,14 @@ static int btrfs_zero_range(struct inode *inode, if (ret < 0) goto out; space_reserved = true; - ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, - alloc_start, bytes_to_reserve); - if (ret) - goto out; ret = btrfs_punch_hole_lock_range(inode, lockstart, lockend, &cached_state); if (ret) goto out; + ret = btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, + alloc_start, bytes_to_reserve); + if (ret) + goto out; ret = btrfs_prealloc_file_range(inode, mode, alloc_start, alloc_end - alloc_start, i_blocksize(inode), -- 2.25.1