From: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> commit 65f0f017e7be8c70330372df23bcb2a407ecf02d upstream. For some block devices which large capacity (e.g. 8TB) but small io_opt size (e.g. 8 sectors), in bcache_device_init() the stripes number calcu- lated by, DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size); might be overflow to the unsigned int bcache_device->nr_stripes. This patch uses the uint64_t variable to store DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL() and after the value is checked to be available in unsigned int range, sets it to bache_device->nr_stripes. Then the overflow is avoided. Reported-and-tested-by: Ken Raeburn <raeburn@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@xxxxxxx> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1783075 Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c @@ -826,19 +826,19 @@ static int bcache_device_init(struct bca struct request_queue *q; const size_t max_stripes = min_t(size_t, INT_MAX, SIZE_MAX / sizeof(atomic_t)); - size_t n; + uint64_t n; int idx; if (!d->stripe_size) d->stripe_size = 1 << 31; - d->nr_stripes = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size); - - if (!d->nr_stripes || d->nr_stripes > max_stripes) { - pr_err("nr_stripes too large or invalid: %u (start sector beyond end of disk?)\n", - (unsigned int)d->nr_stripes); + n = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(sectors, d->stripe_size); + if (!n || n > max_stripes) { + pr_err("nr_stripes too large or invalid: %llu (start sector beyond end of disk?)\n", + n); return -ENOMEM; } + d->nr_stripes = n; n = d->nr_stripes * sizeof(atomic_t); d->stripe_sectors_dirty = kvzalloc(n, GFP_KERNEL);
