On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 11:40:25AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > From: Lihong Kou <koulihong@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit f9c70bdc279b191da8d60777c627702c06e4a37d ]
> >
> > In the case we set or free the global value listen_chan in
> > different threads, we can encounter the UAF problems because
> > the method is not protected by any lock, add one to avoid
> > this bug.
>
> For this to be safe, bt_6lowpan_exit() needs same handling, no?
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek (CIP) <pavel@xxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
> index 9a75f9b00b51..2402ef5ac072 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/6lowpan.c
> @@ -1304,10 +1304,12 @@ static void __exit bt_6lowpan_exit(void)
> debugfs_remove(lowpan_enable_debugfs);
> debugfs_remove(lowpan_control_debugfs);
>
> + mutex_lock(&set_lock);
> if (listen_chan) {
> l2cap_chan_close(listen_chan, 0);
> l2cap_chan_put(listen_chan);
> }
> + mutex_unlock(&set_lock);
>
> disconnect_devices();
>
>
>
Why you are sending this in this format seems very odd to me, you know
better...
