Re: [PATCH 0/3] 3.4-stable timekeeping fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 16:08 -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On 02/13/2014 03:48 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 17:02 -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> >> The rtc-cmos should apply without issue.
> >>
> >> The deadlock item we shouldn't need because 3.2 still raises the softirq
> >> in clock_was_set_delayed instead of calling schedule_work(). So that
> >> should be ok.
> >>
> >> The get_monotonic_boottime fix looks like it should be needed though
> >> (and does apply with fuzz).
> >>
> >> I'm running tests now... would you be able to pick up the patches I've
> >> already sent or do I need to resubmit?
> >
> > I saved the patches and will queue them up for 3.2.56 if your tests
> > passed.
> 
> Tested w/ i386 and arm (since the overflow fix only affects 32bit
> systems) and they both passed.

Thanks a lot.  I've queued up the two applicable patches for 3.2.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]