Re: [PATCH 5.7 000/120] 5.7.13-rc1 review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 07:33:30PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 08:58:20AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:17:38PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.7.13 release.  There
> > > are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to this one.
> > > If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let me know.
> > > 
> > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Aug 2020 12:18:33 +0000.  Anything
> > > received after that time might be too late.
> > > 
> > 
> > Building sparc64:allmodconfig ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > <stdin>:1511:2: warning: #warning syscall clone3 not implemented [-Wcpp]
> > In file included from arch/sparc/include/asm/percpu_64.h:11,
> >                  from arch/sparc/include/asm/percpu.h:5,
> >                  from include/linux/random.h:14,
> >                  from fs/crypto/policy.c:13:
> > arch/sparc/include/asm/trap_block.h:54:39: error: 'NR_CPUS' undeclared here (not in a function)
> >    54 | extern struct trap_per_cpu trap_block[NR_CPUS];
> > 
> > Inherited from mainline. Builds are not complete yet;
> > we may see a few more failures (powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig
> > fails to build in mainline as well).
> 
> If it gets fixed upstream, I'll fix it here :)
> 

Are you serious ? This problem literally affects all branches, starting
with v4.4.y. And, yes, the powerpc builds fail as well for all branches.
Just like mainline. I guess that means it doesn't matter either ?

Building powerpc:ppc64e_defconfig ... failed
--------------
Error log:
In file included from arch/powerpc/include/asm/paca.h:22,
                 from arch/powerpc/include/asm/percpu.h:13,
                 from include/linux/random.h:12,
                 from lib/uuid.c:22:
arch/powerpc/include/asm/mmu.h:131:22: error: unknown type name 'next_tlbcam_idx'

Congratulations, looks like all stable releases are "bug for bug compatible"
with mainline.

Does it even make sense to provide full reports for this set of releases ?

Guenter



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux