Hi
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
fixing commit: d7fefcc8de91 ("mm/cma: add PF flag to force non cma alloc").
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.9, v5.4.52.
v5.7.9: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
01c0bfe061f30 ("mm: rename gfpflags_to_migratetype to gfp_migratetype for same convention")
16867664936e3 ("mm,page_alloc,cma: conditionally prefer cma pageblocks for movable allocations")
3334a45eb9e2b ("mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx")
63b44f01f1974 ("include/linux/sched/mm.h: optimize current_gfp_context()")
97a225e69a1f8 ("mm/page_alloc: integrate classzone_idx and high_zoneidx")
a65064938b815 ("page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast")
v5.4.52: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
01c0bfe061f30 ("mm: rename gfpflags_to_migratetype to gfp_migratetype for same convention")
16867664936e3 ("mm,page_alloc,cma: conditionally prefer cma pageblocks for movable allocations")
3334a45eb9e2b ("mm/page_alloc: use ac->high_zoneidx for classzone_idx")
5644e1fbbfe15 ("mm/vmscan.c: fix data races using kswapd_classzone_idx")
63b44f01f1974 ("include/linux/sched/mm.h: optimize current_gfp_context()")
97a225e69a1f8 ("mm/page_alloc: integrate classzone_idx and high_zoneidx")
a65064938b815 ("page_alloc: consider highatomic reserve in watermark fast")
NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
How should we proceed with this patch?
--
Thanks
Sasha
