On (20/07/21 00:05), Pavel Machek wrote: > > From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > commit ab6f762f0f53162d41497708b33c9a3236d3609e upstream. > > [..] > > Is this still needed in 4.19? 1b710b1b10ef was reverted in 4.19, so > there should not be any user-visible problems... printk_deferred() is still broken and we had similar bug reports which where not caused by 1b710b1b10ef -ss
