[PATCH 5.4 183/215] timer: Prevent base->clk from moving backward

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit 30c66fc30ee7a98c4f3adf5fb7e213b61884474f upstream.

When a timer is enqueued with a negative delta (ie: expiry is below
base->clk), it gets added to the wheel as expiring now (base->clk).

Yet the value that gets stored in base->next_expiry, while calling
trigger_dyntick_cpu(), is the initial timer->expires value. The
resulting state becomes:

	base->next_expiry < base->clk

On the next timer enqueue, forward_timer_base() may accidentally
rewind base->clk. As a possible outcome, timers may expire way too
early, the worst case being that the highest wheel levels get spuriously
processed again.

To prevent from that, make sure that base->next_expiry doesn't get below
base->clk.

Fixes: a683f390b93f ("timers: Forward the wheel clock whenever possible")
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200703010657.2302-1-frederic@xxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 kernel/time/timer.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -585,7 +585,15 @@ trigger_dyntick_cpu(struct timer_base *b
 	 * Set the next expiry time and kick the CPU so it can reevaluate the
 	 * wheel:
 	 */
-	base->next_expiry = timer->expires;
+	if (time_before(timer->expires, base->clk)) {
+		/*
+		 * Prevent from forward_timer_base() moving the base->clk
+		 * backward
+		 */
+		base->next_expiry = base->clk;
+	} else {
+		base->next_expiry = timer->expires;
+	}
 	wake_up_nohz_cpu(base->cpu);
 }
 
@@ -897,10 +905,13 @@ static inline void forward_timer_base(st
 	 * If the next expiry value is > jiffies, then we fast forward to
 	 * jiffies otherwise we forward to the next expiry value.
 	 */
-	if (time_after(base->next_expiry, jnow))
+	if (time_after(base->next_expiry, jnow)) {
 		base->clk = jnow;
-	else
+	} else {
+		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(time_before(base->next_expiry, base->clk)))
+			return;
 		base->clk = base->next_expiry;
+	}
 #endif
 }