From: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 4ab59c3c638c6c8952bf07739805d20eb6358a4d upstream. Charan Teja reported a 'use-after-free' in dmabuffs_dname [1], which happens if the dma_buf_release() is called while the userspace is accessing the dma_buf pseudo fs's dmabuffs_dname() in another process, and dma_buf_release() releases the dmabuf object when the last reference to the struct file goes away. I discussed with Arnd Bergmann, and he suggested that rather than tying the dma_buf_release() to the file_operations' release(), we can tie it to the dentry_operations' d_release(), which will be called when the last ref to the dentry is removed. The path exercised by __fput() calls f_op->release() first, and then calls dput, which eventually calls d_op->d_release(). In the 'normal' case, when no userspace access is happening via dma_buf pseudo fs, there should be exactly one fd, file, dentry and inode, so closing the fd will kill of everything right away. In the presented case, the dentry's d_release() will be called only when the dentry's last ref is released. Therefore, lets move dma_buf_release() from fops->release() to d_ops->d_release() Many thanks to Arnd for his FS insights :) [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1238278/ Fixes: bb2bb9030425 ("dma-buf: add DMA_BUF_SET_NAME ioctls") Reported-by: syzbot+3643a18836bce555bff6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [5.3+] Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Reported-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200611114418.19852-1-sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c @@ -54,37 +54,11 @@ static char *dmabuffs_dname(struct dentr dentry->d_name.name, ret > 0 ? name : ""); } -static const struct dentry_operations dma_buf_dentry_ops = { - .d_dname = dmabuffs_dname, -}; - -static struct vfsmount *dma_buf_mnt; - -static int dma_buf_fs_init_context(struct fs_context *fc) -{ - struct pseudo_fs_context *ctx; - - ctx = init_pseudo(fc, DMA_BUF_MAGIC); - if (!ctx) - return -ENOMEM; - ctx->dops = &dma_buf_dentry_ops; - return 0; -} - -static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = { - .name = "dmabuf", - .init_fs_context = dma_buf_fs_init_context, - .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, -}; - -static int dma_buf_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) +static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry) { struct dma_buf *dmabuf; - if (!is_dma_buf_file(file)) - return -EINVAL; - - dmabuf = file->private_data; + dmabuf = dentry->d_fsdata; BUG_ON(dmabuf->vmapping_counter); @@ -110,9 +84,32 @@ static int dma_buf_release(struct inode module_put(dmabuf->owner); kfree(dmabuf->name); kfree(dmabuf); +} + +static const struct dentry_operations dma_buf_dentry_ops = { + .d_dname = dmabuffs_dname, + .d_release = dma_buf_release, +}; + +static struct vfsmount *dma_buf_mnt; + +static int dma_buf_fs_init_context(struct fs_context *fc) +{ + struct pseudo_fs_context *ctx; + + ctx = init_pseudo(fc, DMA_BUF_MAGIC); + if (!ctx) + return -ENOMEM; + ctx->dops = &dma_buf_dentry_ops; return 0; } +static struct file_system_type dma_buf_fs_type = { + .name = "dmabuf", + .init_fs_context = dma_buf_fs_init_context, + .kill_sb = kill_anon_super, +}; + static int dma_buf_mmap_internal(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma) { struct dma_buf *dmabuf; @@ -412,7 +409,6 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct s } static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = { - .release = dma_buf_release, .mmap = dma_buf_mmap_internal, .llseek = dma_buf_llseek, .poll = dma_buf_poll,
