On 01.07.20 21:33, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> fixing commit: e900a918b098 ("mm: shuffle initial free memory to improve memory-side-cache utilization").
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.7.6, v5.4.49.
>
> v5.7.6: Build OK!
> v5.4.49: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> e03d1f78341e8 ("mm/sparse: rename pfn_present() to pfn_in_present_section()")
>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
It contains
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [5.2+]
so a stable backport is desired once upstream. The v5.4.49 backport
should be fairly easy.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
