On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:24:17PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
Hi, There's no upstream variant of this, as that would require backporting all the io-wq changes from 5.5 and on. Hence I made a one-off that ensures that we don't leak memory if we have async work items that need active cancelation (like socket IO). Can we get this queued up for 5.4? I've tested it and the original reporter has as well.
I've added the previous paragraph which explains why there is no upstream version of this into the commit message and queued it for 5.4, thank you! -- Thanks, Sasha
