Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: pass checksum type via BTRFS_IOC_FS_INFO ioctl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/30/20 3:09 PM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 30/06/2020 02:25, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
>> So, (apologies if I'm already causing you a headache right at the
>> beginning of the week), I'd say... Let's for now park everything I just
>> wrote and drop the whole idea of using input flags for FS_INFO, and keep
>> it output-only and just properly document the output values that have a
>> meaning with the flags bits. Because at least we know that the unused
>> output fields were zeroed before (phew!!).
> 
> So basically you say we're going back to v3? David, do you want me to 
> resend v3 as v5?

I have been thinking out loud, mostly, and then after a night of sleep I
would think: "wait, no, what I thought was a very good idea isn't at
all, actually".

I hope that does not come across as "telling you what to do". ;] I'd
rather hear if someone can spot new flaws in my reasoning.

Hans




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux