[PATCH 4.14 06/78] apparmor: don't try to replace stale label in ptraceme check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit ca3fde5214e1d24f78269b337d3f22afd6bf445e ]

begin_current_label_crit_section() must run in sleepable context because
when label_is_stale() is true, aa_replace_current_label() runs, which uses
prepare_creds(), which can sleep.

Until now, the ptraceme access check (which runs with tasklist_lock held)
violated this rule.

Fixes: b2d09ae449ced ("apparmor: move ptrace checks to using labels")
Reported-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 security/apparmor/lsm.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
index 4f08023101f3c..1c6b389ad8f94 100644
--- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
+++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
@@ -123,11 +123,11 @@ static int apparmor_ptrace_traceme(struct task_struct *parent)
 	struct aa_label *tracer, *tracee;
 	int error;
 
-	tracee = begin_current_label_crit_section();
+	tracee = __begin_current_label_crit_section();
 	tracer = aa_get_task_label(parent);
 	error = aa_may_ptrace(tracer, tracee, AA_PTRACE_TRACE);
 	aa_put_label(tracer);
-	end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
+	__end_current_label_crit_section(tracee);
 
 	return error;
 }
-- 
2.25.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux