From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> commit 7b2182ec381f8ea15c7eb1266d6b5d7da620ad93 upstream. The RPC client currently doesn't handle ERR_CHUNK replies correctly. rpcrdma_complete_rqst() incorrectly passes a negative number to xprt_complete_rqst() as the number of bytes copied. Instead, set task->tk_status to the error value, and return zero bytes copied. In these cases, return -EIO rather than -EREMOTEIO. The RPC client's finite state machine doesn't know what to do with -EREMOTEIO. Additional clean ups: - Don't double-count RDMA_ERROR replies - Remove a stale comment Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c | 9 +++------ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c index ef5102b605895..c56e6cfc4a623 100644 --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c @@ -1246,8 +1246,7 @@ rpcrdma_decode_error(struct rpcrdma_xprt *r_xprt, struct rpcrdma_rep *rep, be32_to_cpup(p), be32_to_cpu(rep->rr_xid)); } - r_xprt->rx_stats.bad_reply_count++; - return -EREMOTEIO; + return -EIO; } /* Perform XID lookup, reconstruction of the RPC reply, and @@ -1284,13 +1283,11 @@ void rpcrdma_complete_rqst(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep) spin_unlock(&xprt->queue_lock); return; -/* If the incoming reply terminated a pending RPC, the next - * RPC call will post a replacement receive buffer as it is - * being marshaled. - */ out_badheader: trace_xprtrdma_reply_hdr(rep); r_xprt->rx_stats.bad_reply_count++; + rqst->rq_task->tk_status = status; + status = 0; goto out; } -- 2.25.1