Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] xhci: Poll for U0 after disabling USB2 LPM" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jun 28, 2020 at 05:38:19PM +0200, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From b3d71abd135e6919ca0b6cab463738472653ddfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:59:49 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] xhci: Poll for U0 after disabling USB2 LPM

USB2 devices with LPM enabled may interrupt the system suspend:
[  932.510475] usb 1-7: usb suspend, wakeup 0
[  932.510549] hub 1-0:1.0: hub_suspend
[  932.510581] usb usb1: bus suspend, wakeup 0
[  932.510590] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: port 9 not suspended
[  932.510593] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: port 8 not suspended
..
[  932.520323] xhci_hcd 0000:00:14.0: Port change event, 1-7, id 7, portsc: 0x400e03
..
[  932.591405] PM: pci_pm_suspend(): hcd_pci_suspend+0x0/0x30 returns -16
[  932.591414] PM: dpm_run_callback(): pci_pm_suspend+0x0/0x160 returns -16
[  932.591418] PM: Device 0000:00:14.0 failed to suspend async: error -16

During system suspend, USB core will let HC suspends the device if it
doesn't have remote wakeup enabled and doesn't have any children.
However, from the log above we can see that the usb 1-7 doesn't get bus
suspended due to not in U0. After a while the port finished U2 -> U0
transition, interrupts the suspend process.

The observation is that after disabling LPM, port doesn't transit to U0
immediately and can linger in U2. xHCI spec 4.23.5.2 states that the
maximum exit latency for USB2 LPM should be BESL + 10us. The BESL for
the affected device is advertised as 400us, which is still not enough
based on my testing result.

So let's use the maximum permitted latency, 10000, to poll for U0
status to solve the issue.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200624135949.22611-6-mathias.nyman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've adjusted the patch to missing 38986ffa6a74 ("xhci: use port
structures instead of port arrays in xhci.c functions") and queued it
for 4.14, 4.9, and 4.4.

--
Thanks,
Sasha



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux