On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 04:04:13PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 04:53:08PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Upstream commit 64611a15ca9d ("dm crypt: avoid truncating the logical block size")
> > upstream: v5.8-rc1
> > Fixes: ad6bf88a6c19 ("block: fix an integer overflow in logical block size")
> > in linux-4.4.y: b8cd70b724f0
> > in linux-4.9.y: 5dbde467ccd6
> > in linux-4.14.y: 0c7a7d8e62bd
> > in linux-4.19.y: a7f79052d1af
> > in linux-5.4.y: 6eed26e35cfd
> > upstream: v5.5-rc7
> > Affected branches:
> > linux-4.4.y (conflicts - backport needed)
> > linux-4.9.y (conflicts - backport needed)
> > linux-4.14.y
> > linux-4.19.y
> > linux-5.4.y
> > linux-5.6.y
> > linux-5.7.y
>
> Can you provide a backport for this?
>
That one is easy: 4.9.y and 4.4.y are not affected even though ad6bf88a6c19
has been applied there. Reason is that 64611a15ca9d only applies if
bc9e9cf0401f1 ("dm crypt: don't decrease device limits") is in the tree.
This in turn is a fix for 8f0009a22517 ("dm crypt: optionally support
larger encryption sector size"). None of those is in v4.4.y/v4.9.y.
> > Upstream commit 2f02fd3fa13e ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir")
> > upstream: v5.8-rc1
> > Fixes: b469e7e47c8a ("fanotify: fix handling of events on child sub-directory")
> > in linux-4.9.y: 987d8ff3a2d8
> > in linux-4.14.y: 515160e3c4f2
> > in linux-4.19.y: 20663629f6ae
> > upstream: v4.20-rc3
> > Affected branches:
> > linux-4.9.y (conflicts - backport needed)
> > linux-4.14.y (conflicts - backport needed)
> > linux-4.19.y
> > linux-5.4.y (already applied)
> > linux-5.6.y (already applied)
> > linux-5.7.y (already applied)
>
> Do you have a backport?
>
I _think_ this doesn't apply either because it also depends on
837a393438475 ("fanotify: generalize fanotify_should_send_event()")
which is not in v4.14.y and earlier, but I may be wrong. That code
isn't exactly easy to understand.
> For all other patches you listed, I've queued up the missing ones, some
> already got merged since you sent this out.
>
Thanks!
Guenter
