Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] memcg: reparent charges of children before processing parent" failed to apply to 3.13-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:40:20PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Mar 2014, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:59:27PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > The patch below does not apply to the 3.13-stable tree.
> > > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> > > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> > > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
> > > > 
> > > > thanks,
> > > > 
> > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > ------------------ version for 3.13.7 ------------------
> > 
> > Thanks, now applied.
> 
> Thanks for including this in the 3.13.7-stable review series, Greg.
> But I notice there wasn't one in the 3.10.34-stable review series:
> I now think that I should have interpreted your FAILED on 3.13 mail
> as a prompt to send equivalents for the earlier releases too, sorry.
> 
> The version for Jiri's 3.12.15 would be the same as that for 3.13.7.
> 
> But the version for 3.10.34 (or perhaps now 3.10.35) is this below.
> Yes, more differences, and the old mem_cgroup_reparent_charges line
> is intentionally left in for 3.10 whereas it was removed for 3.12+:
> that's because the css/cgroup iterator changed in between, it used
> not to supply the root of the subtree, but nowadays it does.

Thanks, I've queued this up for 3.10-stable now.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]