From: Giuliano Procida <gprocida@xxxxxxxxxx>
This fixes the
4.9 backport commit f530afb974c2e82047bd6220303a2dbe30eff304
which was
upstream commit f5bbbbe4d63577026f908a809f22f5fd5a90ea1f.
The upstream commit added a call to synchronize_rcu to
_blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues, just after freezing queues.
In the backport this landed (in blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues instead),
just after unfreezeing queues.
This commit moves the call to its intended place.
Fixes: f530afb974c2 ("blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter")
Signed-off-by: Giuliano Procida <gprocida@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 58be2eaa5aaa..e0ed7317e98c 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -2331,6 +2331,10 @@ void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
+ /*
+ * Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
set->nr_hw_queues = nr_hw_queues;
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list) {
@@ -2346,10 +2350,6 @@ void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
- /*
- * Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
- */
- synchronize_rcu();
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues);
--
2.25.1
