Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: sync the update nr_hw_queues with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Greg.

Is this patch (and the similar one for 4.9) queued?

Giuliano.

On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 14:01, Giuliano Procida <gprocida@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> -bouncing mail.
>
> This one is for 4.14. Apologies.
>
> Giuliano.
>
> On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 10:39, Giuliano Procida <gprocida@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > From: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit f5bbbbe4d63577026f908a809f22f5fd5a90ea1f upstream.
> >
> > For blk-mq, part_in_flight/rw will invoke blk_mq_in_flight/rw to
> > account the inflight requests. It will access the queue_hw_ctx and
> > nr_hw_queues w/o any protection. When updating nr_hw_queues and
> > blk_mq_in_flight/rw occur concurrently, panic comes up.
> >
> > Before update nr_hw_queues, the q will be frozen. So we could use
> > q_usage_counter to avoid the race. percpu_ref_is_zero is used here
> > so that we will not miss any in-flight request. The access to
> > nr_hw_queues and queue_hw_ctx in blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter are
> > under rcu critical section, __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues could use
> > synchronize_rcu to ensure the zeroed q_usage_counter to be globally
> > visible.
> >
> > Backporting Notes
> >
> > This is a re-backport, landing synchronize_rcu in the right place.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianchao Wang <jianchao.w.wang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Giuliano Procida <gprocida@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index 9d53f476c517..cf56bdad2e06 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -2738,6 +2738,10 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> >
> >         list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> >                 blk_mq_freeze_queue(q);
> > +       /*
> > +        * Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
> > +        */
> > +       synchronize_rcu();
> >
> >         set->nr_hw_queues = nr_hw_queues;
> >         blk_mq_update_queue_map(set);
> > @@ -2748,10 +2752,6 @@ static void __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
> >
> >         list_for_each_entry(q, &set->tag_list, tag_set_list)
> >                 blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(q);
> > -       /*
> > -        * Sync with blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter.
> > -        */
> > -       synchronize_rcu();
> >  }
> >
> >  void blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, int nr_hw_queues)
> > --
> > 2.27.0.278.ge193c7cf3a9-goog
> >



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux